![impacts of globalization pdf impacts of globalization pdf](https://i1.rgstatic.net/publication/5044816_Impact_of_globalization_on_monetary_policy_commentary/links/00b49529c5a871f8a8000000/largepreview.png)
Thus, it will not directly address the consequences of globalisation for state-society relations, for democracy, civil society, migration, national identity and culture which are related issues.4 This article regards the relationship between the state and globalisation as one of both continuity and change. 3 Paul Q Hirst and Grahame Thompson (1996), Globalisation in Question: The International Economy and the Possibilities of Governance, Cambridge: Blackwell. 365-369 Susan Strange (1999), The Westfailure System, Review of International Studies, 25(3), pp. 2 Susan Strange (1997), The Erosion of the State, Current History, 96 (613), pp. Since the issues are so wide ranging, limitations of space dictate that this essay can concentrate only on those issues which are particularly relevant to the question of whether ** Dr Nilfer Karacasulu Gksel is Assistant Professor at the Faculty of Business, Department of International Relations, Dokuz Eylul University, Buca, Izmir 1 David Held (1989), Political Theory and the Modern State Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, p. Against this view, globalisation believers argue that globalisation cannot be resisted. There are globalisation sceptics denying the reality of globalisation or questioning the extent of change attributable to globalisation. This literature has been dominated by the intense debate of decline of state2 versus continued strength of state3.
![impacts of globalization pdf impacts of globalization pdf](http://searchpin.weebly.com/uploads/1/2/6/6/126652363/909298700_orig.png)
Much has been written that connects globalisation and the state. This essay will discuss, in a basic outline, the implications of globalisation for the state. Thus, states should determine their own direction and policies.1 (Held, 1989:215) Externally, there is no absolute authority above and beyond the state. Internal sovereignty is where the sovereign or government exercises absolute authority over a particular society. Sovereignty has two dimensions: internal and external. The Westphalia state was moreover sovereign, that is, it exercised comprehensive, supreme, unqualified and exclusive control over its designated territorial domain. Statehood meant that the world divided into territorial parcels, each of which was ruled by a separate government. At the core of this mode of governance stood the principles of statehood and sovereignty. Is globalisation a threat to the Westphalia system? The Westphalia system was a framework of governance. Introduction At the beginning of the 21st century, we are living in an era of